I recently read a nice article written by Ilona Burton over at The Independent. That is not to say it was flawless. In a way, she sort of almost wound up contradiction her own thesis. But, despite that, it was a refreshing criticism of those who condemn pro-ana sites as responsible for the eating disorder problem. And, even better still, she placed the whole discussion in the larger context of pop culture blaming generally.
As I've argued at the site Celebrities with Eating Disorders, blaming celebrities in this manner is a ruse of self denial. Eating disorders, whether they're ours or those of our loved ones, are our responsibility, not that of some media conjured straw man. Whatever you think of pro-ana sites, it is baseless to accuse them as a direct cause. In fact, such sites are as much symptom as cause. A brief reminder of pop culture history reveals that this urge to blame some semi-anonymous "other" for the corruption of youth or the corrosion of society is a rather old cop-out.
Such ridiculous attitudes go right back to ancient Athens, where none other than Plato fretted over the corrupting influence upon Athenian youth of theater and poetry. Throughout the ages the same theme appears over and over again. The explosion of 20th century mass communication media has though really thrown open the flood gates for this kind of pop culture blame-game.
In the 1940s social critics condemned swing music as a morally eroding influence that would hinder the war effort. In the 40s and 50s comic books were supposedly the cause of an alleged youth violence epidemic and juvenile delinquency. Elvis Presley couldn't be shown on television form the hips down and there was deep anxiety about the libidinal blackness of the music with which he was making nice young girls swoon.
By the 60s, TV was itself a form of social decay, rotting the brains of youth everywhere. And the Beatles were supposedly causing an explosion of free love and psychedelic drug use. There was a Beatle-mania-backlash that led to angry mobs burning Beatles' records in huge bonfires, with some disc-jockeys and politicians calling it devil's music, subsequent to an impious remark by John Lennon. And in the 70s, it was the raw sensuality and physicality of disco music that was alleged to be destroying the fabric of decently modest sexual mores.
Throughout the 1980s and 90s we heard from the anguished voices of left-wing feminists lamenting that pornography created rapists and right-wing moralists warning that heavy metal music caused Satanism. Rap music supposedly caused criminality, raves were hotbeds of social decay and drug induced fatalities, while the recent World Wide Web was accused of turning young people into trance like computer zombies wasting away in their parents' basements.
So, you can see, it's an old, old story. Mass media and popular culture have gotten blamed for it all: apathy and violence, social conformism and social deviancy. No surprise then that now we find them being blamed for causing both anorexia and obesity.
One doesn't have to peer too closely behind the curtain of all this to see what's going on: a resolute refusal to accept responsibility for our own choices and actions. Whether those choices and actions are part of an eating disorder or our own response to the eating disorder of a loved one, it's easier, more comforting, to blame something else. After all, the alternative would be to have to face that our own choices and actions, or those of our loved ones, can be disturbing, despairing and even destructive. It is so much more comforting to conjure up dragons. At the end of the day, though, no amount of self denial removes the challenges which remain before us.
Each one of us is uniquely responsible for what we do, with our own lives, and in response to the choices of our loved ones. Turning others into our punching bags or scapegoats may provide some momentary relief from the burden of personal responsibility. It ultimately solves nothing, though. The celebrities of stage, screen and runway, are easy targets, but that can't (even if they wanted to) make anyone choose how to live.
If people do not take responsibility for their own actions, their own families and their own communities, every problem will be a chimera, in need of some magical solution. Blaming mass media or popular culture celebrities with eating disorders for our own choices and those of our children is magical thinking.
A mythical dragon though is merely a straw man. Yes, it is a comforting means for unleashing our rage and deflecting our anger, disappointment and fear. It does nothing though to help us come to grips with real problems - and real solutions.
As I've argued at the site Celebrities with Eating Disorders, blaming celebrities in this manner is a ruse of self denial. Eating disorders, whether they're ours or those of our loved ones, are our responsibility, not that of some media conjured straw man. Whatever you think of pro-ana sites, it is baseless to accuse them as a direct cause. In fact, such sites are as much symptom as cause. A brief reminder of pop culture history reveals that this urge to blame some semi-anonymous "other" for the corruption of youth or the corrosion of society is a rather old cop-out.
Such ridiculous attitudes go right back to ancient Athens, where none other than Plato fretted over the corrupting influence upon Athenian youth of theater and poetry. Throughout the ages the same theme appears over and over again. The explosion of 20th century mass communication media has though really thrown open the flood gates for this kind of pop culture blame-game.
In the 1940s social critics condemned swing music as a morally eroding influence that would hinder the war effort. In the 40s and 50s comic books were supposedly the cause of an alleged youth violence epidemic and juvenile delinquency. Elvis Presley couldn't be shown on television form the hips down and there was deep anxiety about the libidinal blackness of the music with which he was making nice young girls swoon.
By the 60s, TV was itself a form of social decay, rotting the brains of youth everywhere. And the Beatles were supposedly causing an explosion of free love and psychedelic drug use. There was a Beatle-mania-backlash that led to angry mobs burning Beatles' records in huge bonfires, with some disc-jockeys and politicians calling it devil's music, subsequent to an impious remark by John Lennon. And in the 70s, it was the raw sensuality and physicality of disco music that was alleged to be destroying the fabric of decently modest sexual mores.
Throughout the 1980s and 90s we heard from the anguished voices of left-wing feminists lamenting that pornography created rapists and right-wing moralists warning that heavy metal music caused Satanism. Rap music supposedly caused criminality, raves were hotbeds of social decay and drug induced fatalities, while the recent World Wide Web was accused of turning young people into trance like computer zombies wasting away in their parents' basements.
So, you can see, it's an old, old story. Mass media and popular culture have gotten blamed for it all: apathy and violence, social conformism and social deviancy. No surprise then that now we find them being blamed for causing both anorexia and obesity.
One doesn't have to peer too closely behind the curtain of all this to see what's going on: a resolute refusal to accept responsibility for our own choices and actions. Whether those choices and actions are part of an eating disorder or our own response to the eating disorder of a loved one, it's easier, more comforting, to blame something else. After all, the alternative would be to have to face that our own choices and actions, or those of our loved ones, can be disturbing, despairing and even destructive. It is so much more comforting to conjure up dragons. At the end of the day, though, no amount of self denial removes the challenges which remain before us.
Each one of us is uniquely responsible for what we do, with our own lives, and in response to the choices of our loved ones. Turning others into our punching bags or scapegoats may provide some momentary relief from the burden of personal responsibility. It ultimately solves nothing, though. The celebrities of stage, screen and runway, are easy targets, but that can't (even if they wanted to) make anyone choose how to live.
If people do not take responsibility for their own actions, their own families and their own communities, every problem will be a chimera, in need of some magical solution. Blaming mass media or popular culture celebrities with eating disorders for our own choices and those of our children is magical thinking.
A mythical dragon though is merely a straw man. Yes, it is a comforting means for unleashing our rage and deflecting our anger, disappointment and fear. It does nothing though to help us come to grips with real problems - and real solutions.
About the Author:
Follow us for all the hottest news on all manner of controversies over Celebrities with Eating Disorders . Mickey Jhonny is a reliable source of insightful and provocative articles on popular culture. If you're a fan of the Girl with the Dragon Tattoo series, his post ripping off the cover of its hidden inspiration is an absolute must read.
0 comments:
Enregistrer un commentaire